Crowdfunding Is Here To Stay-But What’s That Mean For Investors/Entrepreneurs?
- Posted by Jeff Carter
- on January 24th, 2013
Crowdfunding is a relatively new part of Startup ecosystems. A larger percentage of people that I know in the startup world, both investors and founders, support crowdfunding. They are going by the theory that more is better. Most also believe in freedom, equality, open access and other basic tenants of American society. The basic idea of crowdfunding fits with that.
I am not for or against crowdfunding. It’s a reality and I think that investors and founders need to grapple with what it means for their investments or company. If you want to understand the finer legal points surrounding crowdfunding, check out William Carleton’s blog. He does a great job defining and explaining.
When analyzing it, I think it’s critically important to use positive economic analysis, and not normative analysis to understand crowdfunding and its effects and outcomes on startup ecosystems. Using words like “good” or “bad” emotionally charge the issue, and lead you down the wrong intellectual thought/evaluation path.
Depending on who you are as a founder, crowdfunding can help or hurt your business. Experienced founders that have successfully navigated the hard entrepreneurial road before probably can benefit from taking some crowdfunded money-as long as it isn’t the lion’s share of their capital raise.
Experienced founders know what they are doing. They need less mentorship, and generally have a great network of previous contacts they can tap into to help them when problems occur. When they organize boards, they bring in the right people to help them.
But even experienced founders need mentorship, help attracting customers and general strategy help. It is unclear how they would tap into that from a group of crowdfunded investors. It’s also unclear how they would manage those investors in the capitalization table, and what later stage investors would make of crowdfunded groups on that cap table.
If you are an inexperienced founder, I wouldn’t recommend a crowdfunded deal. Maybe a small slice. But you will need the mentorship of investors and their networks to help you through the rough seas you are going to face.
There is a life cycle of investment for every company. Rarely is it one round and done. Corporate finance is a strategy just like marketing, operations, HR, or any other strategic decision a CEO makes.
From the investor perspective, crowdfunding is a double edged sword. The advantage is that the investor might get into more deals that they otherwise wouldn’t see. I live in Chicago, and the deal flow that I see generally comes from the midwest. If I wanted to break into the deal flow somewhere else, it would require investment of time and money to build a trusted network in those places. With online crowdfunding, I can do it virtually.
However, as an investor, I don’t like to spray and pray with my investment dollars. Crowdfunding is that approach. It’s hard to have a meaningful effect on the outcome of a company by investing in this manner. With the rate of failure in startups, my guess is there aren’t going to be a lot of big home run wins in Crowdfunded investments. Because of the value engaged early stage investors bring to the table, my guess is Crowdfunded companies will do worse than traditionally funded companies in sum. That’s a hypothesis and it’s far too early to tell.
As an investor, I also like to get to know the management team extremely well before I invest. Before I invested in Marc and Dan’s Kapow Events, I knew them for five months. We got to speak on several occasions. We were able to have breakfast and knock down a few beers with each other. Before the money went into the company, we had a good relationship. You can ask them what they think of my performance as an investor post investment-but they have done all that I have asked of them.
One thing you learn early on in angel investing, bet on jockeys not ideas. Crowdfunding strikes me as betting on ideas.
If you are an inexperienced startup investor, I wouldn’t use crowdfunding. You are guaranteed to lose money. You are better off donating to a favorite charity. If you really want to invest in startups, invest in a fund that specializes in this type of investing-or join a local angel group. You might lose the same amount of money but you will have better impact and the probability of success for you is probably higher.
There is wisdom in crowds. Markets make better decisions than individuals. But markets also are disciplined with constraints and experience. It’s not clear that crowdfunding replicates a market of rational investors.
As Crowdfunding matures, it’s going to evolve. It’s important to keep good data on outcomes. What we have today is only data on dollars invested. What I’d like to know is how crowdfunded investors have helped companies other than with a check. I’d also like to know success/failure of exclusively crowdfunded companies versus the metrics on traditionally funded ones. Good data will tell investors and founders a lot.
I have a general idea of how I think a well managed crowdfunded fund could work(and work powerfully well)-but haven’t put it into practice yet because the rules are still being written. Maybe an investment house or bank and I could develop a cool partnership.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
Jeffrey Carter is an angel investor and independent trader. He specializes in turning concepts into profits. He co-founded Hyde Park Angels one of the most active angel groups in the United States in April of 2007. He previously served on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Board of Directors. He has done market commentary for (More...)
Tags CloudAlexi Giannoulias american airlines Big Green Egg Carl Levin commissions commodities Conditions and Diseases Corporations Crop intentions Currencies Dan Dicker Environment Eric Holder Externality Fat Tuesday Glass–Steagall Act GOP Hanoi Hilton Heathrow Klout Lake Michigan Leaving Illinois Makes and Models Mali Marshall Field Massachusetts Mayor Bloomberg Montgomery Ward NFC East Obama Omaha Nebraska pipeline President of the United States Quicken Ryan Budget School vouchers Skin neoplasm Steak T Tenby United States Department of Defense United States Treasury security University of Notre Dame VC Wichita State
Becker Posner Blog
Ben Horowitz Blog
Betting the Business
Black Line Review
Blue Sky Innovation
Both Sides of the Table
Business News Network
Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business
Cooler By The Lake
Daily Economic Release Calendar
Doug Ross @ Journal
Economics of a POW Camp
Foundation for Families
Garden and Gun
George Stigler Institute
Good Beer Hunting
Great Food In Chicago-Steve Dolinsky
Hyde Park Angels
Illinois College of Business
John Taylor's Blog
Legal Issues in Angel Funding
Macroblog-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Microbrews in Chicago
Mike And G
Milton Friedman Institute
National World War Two Museum
Notes From Underground
Ronald Coase Institute
Senate Banking Committee
The Big Picture
The Clubber Fund
The Daily Crux
The Grumpy Economist
The Jack B Show
The Minimalist Trader
The Musings of The Big Red Car
The Polsky Center
The Streetwise Professor
Tough Love Marketing
US Federal Reserve Bank
US House Financial Services Committee
World War Two Blog