A Preview of What’s To Come
- Posted by Jeff Carter
- on August 23rd, 2012
Last night I had the chance to preview some Excelerate Labs companies. If you are going to the Demo Day next week, I think you will be happy you came. The class is very creative and well prepared. I have already dispersed some material to a few target customers, downloaded some of their apps and put them on my phone.
Often times, many wonder if accelerators are worth it. My answer is, “It depends.”. It depends on a lot of things, but if the lab has the track record of Y-Combinator, TechStars, or Excelerate then I’d say they are worth it. Those are the three places I am familiar with, so I cannot comment on any others. My friend Raman Chadha probably can though.
Some accelerators aren’t worth it. Why? What should an accelerator do?
From the investor perspective, accelerators should polish the business so it has a revenue model. Or, if it’s a no revenue model company, point the business on a path to get viral customer acquisition. Figure out what the costs of running the business are and how to anticipate the costs of scaling. Getting a rough timeline is a good idea. General business planning.
They should also teach you how to pitch. Raising capital is the second most important thing for a start up. Getting customers is the most important thing and a good accelerator will focus you on that.
Once the firm graduates from the accelerator, it should have a clear idea where it’s headed and it should have intense focus. It should have goals and start to try and attain them. It should have one or two people it trusts to take problems to, mentors they call them.
The aforementioned accelerators do all that and sometimes more. In return, they take a small equity piece.
What do bad accelerators do? They don’t prepare companies for what awaits them. They give you mentors that can’t mentor, or they don’t create meaningful connections for you. They take your equity and leave you to die.
Poor accelerators will keep you busy doing tasks. But those tasks aren’t relevant to your business. They seem more like really bad basic training rather than purpose driven exercises designed to stimulate either growth of your company or team.
Another characteristic of a good accelerator is the ability of the founders to admit when they make mistakes. I think great accelerators always learn from their classes, their mentors and investors that interact with them. They get stronger over time.
I find that when I interact with anyone from the aforementioned accelerators, they will readily admit their strengths, weaknesses and where they screwed up in the past and how they tried to fix it. They share their methods and data. They have high integrity levels and they are transparent.
Over the course of the summer I have had some time to interact with Excelerate in Chicago. I am as impressed with the people running the place as I am with some of the companies in it. When I compare it to the first class, it only gets better and better.
There are opportunity costs to entering an accelerator. Time, which is more important than the little bit of equity you give up. Maybe some money if you have to move to a place to enter one. Each firm has to weigh all that before accepting a spot in one.
Many equate going to a prestigious accelerator with going to an Ivy League school. That comparison is way to simplistic. There is still plenty of risk for firms coming out of an accelerator. There is no pedigree that follows the firm around for the rest of its life. No old boys network. Each firm has to create value on its own. But well run accelerators help them get on track and up to speed much faster and more efficiently than firms that try difficult things on their own.
A well run accelerator is a gem in an entrepreneurial ecosystem. A poorly run one is a lump of fool’s gold.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
Jeffrey Carter is an angel investor and independent trader. He specializes in turning concepts into profits. He co-founded Hyde Park Angels one of the most active angel groups in the United States in April of 2007. He previously served on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Board of Directors. He has done market commentary for (More...)
Tags Cloud$425 million Cheez Whiz Chef Paul Kahan Chicago Alderman D Day Democratic Party (United States) Desktime Faith Famous Footwear FOMC football trick plays Gaza Gridlock How to Cook A Chicken Innovation Jamie Dimon Joe Bloggs KC_F Labor force Lean Startup LSU Maker Max Levchin Midwestern United States Military Mind Reading MON Nate Silver NEWS NOLA NPK Obama Economic Rating Phil Pearlman Pope John Paul Publishing Quantitative easing Ron Paul Sarbanes Oxley Social Investing Statue of Liberty The Butcher and The Larder Unemployment USA PATRIOT Act Volcker Rule Wine Country
Becker Posner Blog
Ben Horowitz Blog
Betting the Business
Black Line Review
Both Sides of the Table
Business News Network
Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business
Cooler By The Lake
Daily Economic Release Calendar
Doug Ross @ Journal
Economics of a POW Camp
Foundation for Families
Garden and Gun
George Stigler Institute
Good Beer Hunting
Hyde Park Angels
Illinois College of Business
John Taylor's Blog
Legal Issues in Angel Funding
Macroblog-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Microbrews in Chicago
Mike And G
Milton Friedman Institute
National World War Two Museum
Notes From Underground
Ronald Coase Institute
Senate Banking Committee
Take A Report
The Big Picture
The Clubber Fund
The Daily Crux
The Grumpy Economist
The Jack B Show
The Minimalist Trader
The Musings of The Big Red Car
The Polsky Center
The Streetwise Professor
Tough Love Marketing
US Federal Reserve Bank
US House Financial Services Committee
World War Two Blog