More on Central Planning versus Free Markets
- Posted by Jeff Carter
- on October 26th, 2010
These people int he Obama administration just don’t get it. They are so committed to the notion that they can think for everyone else, and that markets are puppets to be played with.
The battle being waged in economics is between freshwater free market guys, and saltwater guys like Austan Goolsbee, that think central planning, targeted spending, and targeted tax rates do better. Free markets can certainly be messy-but they are the most efficient way out of any economic mess.
In this case, Cochrane takes Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to task over trade imbalances and currency valuations. This assumes that trade imbalances are “bad” or “good” and that a bunch of guys in a smoke filled room can figure out what currency rates should be. This assumes that the smoke filled room can do it better than a free market that trades well over 3 Trillion in a single day.
It bugs the crap out of me when I hear about jobs being exported to China. It’s a statement with no data behind it. That type of statement shows ignorance, because it assumes global economics is a zero sum game.
It further galls me when I hear politicos stamp their feet over Chinese and other foreign investors taking their money and buying assets in America. Really? Who cares? Recall how much the Japanese invested in the US in the early 1980′s. Everyone was going to be speaking Japanese. We know how that turned out. By the way, it’s good for foreigners to invest in the US. It gives them incentives to make sure those investments pay off-thus making things better for indigenous US citizens.
In the book Fault Lines, by Raghu Rajan, another freshwater guy, he talks extensively about economies that only base their GDP growth on foreign export. Eventually, they fall apart.
In summary, Professor Cochrane takes Secretary Geithner out to the woodshed and gives him some well deserved smacks,
“What’s the right policy toward China? They put a few trillion dollars worth of stuff on boats and sent it to us in exchange for U.S. government bonds. Those bonds lost a lot of value when the dollar fell relative to the euro and other currencies. Then they put more stuff on boats and took in ever more dubious debt in exchange. We’re in the process of devaluing again. The Chinese government’s accumulation of U.S. debt represents a tragic investment decision, not a currency-manipulation effort. The right policy is flowers and chocolates, or at least a polite thank-you note.
Yet Mr. Geithner thinks that the Chinese somehow hurt us. There is at work here a strange marriage of Keynesianism and mercantilism—the view that U.S. consumers supported the world economy by spending beyond our means, so that other people could have the pleasure of sending things in exchange for pieces of paper.
This is all as fuzzy as it seems. Markets and exchange rates are not always right. But it is a pipe dream that busybodies at the IMF can find “imbalances,” properly diagnose “overvalued” exchange rates, then “coordinate” structural, fiscal and exchange rate policies to “facilitate an orderly rebalancing of global demand,” especially using “medium-term targets” rather than concrete actions. The German economics minister, Rainer Brüderle, called this “planned economy thinking.” He was being generous. Planners have a clearer idea of what they are doing.”
Cochrane hits the nail on the head in the last paragraph. Busybodies don’t know. People that interact for their own self interest in a broad market as buyers and sellers know much better. The entire agenda of the Obama administration, even the Democratic Party is that of the busybody. We need to tell Mrs. Kravitz to go home.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
Jeffrey Carter is an angel investor and independent trader. He specializes in turning concepts into profits. He co-founded Hyde Park Angels one of the most active angel groups in the United States in April of 2007. He previously served on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Board of Directors. He has done market commentary for (More...)
Tags CloudBig Sugar Bill of Rights birth control Bob Goodlatte Bond Spreads brokers campaign finance reform Chateau Neuf Chicago Mayor Race Coase commodities Credit rating agency Dabble D Day Deutsche Bank double dip recession Fiat money Fox News GAAP Gasoline Harvard Business School High Speed Rail Homeschooling Jesus Labor Day LINK FEST Margaritaville Mental health Mergers Nature of the Firm ndaq North Avenue Beach PayPal Peter Roskam Recreations Revenue Richard Pittman Russian River Brewing Company Shooting range Standing rib roast Stocktoberfest TechWeek transaction tax Women Zero Sum Game
Becker Posner Blog
Ben Horowitz Blog
Betting the Business
Black Line Review
Blue Sky Innovation
Both Sides of the Table
Business News Network
Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business
Cooler By The Lake
Daily Economic Release Calendar
Doug Ross @ Journal
Economics of a POW Camp
Foundation for Families
Garden and Gun
George Stigler Institute
Good Beer Hunting
Great Food In Chicago-Steve Dolinsky
Hyde Park Angels
Illinois College of Business
John Taylor's Blog
Legal Issues in Angel Funding
Macroblog-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Microbrews in Chicago
Mike And G
Milton Friedman Institute
National World War Two Museum
Notes From Underground
Ronald Coase Institute
Senate Banking Committee
The Big Picture
The Clubber Fund
The Daily Crux
The Grumpy Economist
The Jack B Show
The Minimalist Trader
The Musings of The Big Red Car
The Polsky Center
The Streetwise Professor
Tough Love Marketing
US Federal Reserve Bank
US House Financial Services Committee
World War Two Blog