Dividends Versus Share Buybacks
- Posted by Jeff Carter
- on July 23rd, 2010

This is a controversial topic these days in corporate finance. Corporations are accumulating cash on their balance sheets. Why would a company deliberately accumulate cash? Carrying excess cash can put a target on a company’s back. They become a target for takeover.
-They cut costs, sales are either up or level and they recognize more revenue from operations.
-They are hoarding cash with expectation that economic conditions will be tougher in the future, especially given the massive tax hike companies will get on January 1, 2011.
-They don’t have any internal company projects that are net present value positive to spend it on
-They don’t see any potential acquisition targets that appeal to them.
-Pay down any outstanding debt. However, many companies want some debt because of the tax advantages of debt.
In a nutshell, these are the options available to the typical Chief Financial Officer(CFO). When they exhaust these options, they are left with two more.
-pay a dividend to the holders of preferred or common shares
-buyback stock
Each action has opportunity costs.
Paying a dividend to investors might create tax problems for the investors. Many investors prefer NOT to get a dividend, and would rather make money via the capital appreciation of the stock. Many mutual funds prefer not to get dividends, and make their voice heard in no uncertain terms. The US government also has a backward tax policy, so dividends get taxed twice. Once when the company earns the money, and second when the investor gets the proceeds. It’s a really dumb policy that should be changed.
Buying back stock does nothing for the long term holders of the shares. It only rewards speculators, option holders who want to sell (i.e. management) and short term swing traders. Buybacks don’t do anything to improve the financial position of the company. As a matter of fact, it is a way for management to try and mask poor performance by monkeying with PE ratios.
Research points to a few things. When a company engages in a buyback, generally their share price declines after the buyback. It’s not necessarily a bullish signal. A bullish signal is if management uses their own money to buy stock. Rest assured, if a top line manager is buying their own companies stock it’s going up.
Buybacks also benefit investment banking firms. This may be why they are the rage. Investment bankers act as brokers to the transaction, earn a fee from that. They also earn a fee for their advice, and a fee for structuring the buyback. Investment banks have a giant incentive to encourage buybacks rather than dividends.
Dividends on the other hand actually are good for investors despite the tax consequences. The investor that reinvests their dividends rather than accept a check does better over the long haul than investors that do with buybacks. Dividends also tangibly increase total return on a stock-buybacks don’t. Dividends are cheap for a company to administer, buybacks are not. Traditionally, distributed dividends point to the health of a company-buybacks don’t.
In my opinion, stock buybacks are generally bad for investors.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
Jeffrey Carter is a serial entrepreneur, angel investor and independent trader. He specializes in turning concepts into profits. He co-founded Hyde Park Angels one of the most active angel groups in the United States in April of 2007. He previously served on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Board of Directors. He has done market commentary for (More...) -
Archives
Tags Cloud
Abortion Alternative Energy Amazing Grace Angels Beck Bond vigilante Bourbon Trail Business Insider Chicago Alderman Colorado DADT Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders David Brooks Ezra Klein Florida Primary FOMC Meeting Founding Fathers govt spending Guest Blogger help desk holiday IMF Interest Rates Jim Skinner Marc Faber Margins Medicaid Munibonds National Anthem NYX Olympics 2016 OWS Personnel protectionism Random Rick Monday Rubashkin Sports Steve Jobs Technology Triple Crown Tuition costs Valerie Jarrett wage disparity World Bicycle Relief-
BlogRoll
-
Abnormal Returns
All Tuition
American Thinker
Andy Narayanan
BBQ Nation
Becker Posner Blog
Betches Love This
Betting the Business
BloombergTV
Brad Delong
Business Insider
Business News Network
Carpe Diem
CBOE
CFTC
Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business
Chicago Boyz
CityWide SuperSlow
CME Group
CNBC
CNNMoney
Confused by Confucius
Daily Economic Release Calendar
Doug Ross @ Journal
Fama-French Forum
Farmgate
Fault Lines
Fee Fighters
Foundation for Families
Fox Business
Freakonomics
George Stigler Institute
Good Beer Hunting
Greg Mankiw's Blog
Hayek Institute
Huffington Post
Hyde Park Angels
ICE
Illinois College of Business
Instapundit.com
Intrade
Iowahawk
James Pethokoukis
John Taylor's Blog
Macroblog-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Marginal Revolution
Microbrews in Chicago
Mike And G
Milton Friedman Institute
Murmur Creek Observatory
NakedTrader
NASDAQ
National World War Two Museum
Nice Deb
Noblivity
Notes From Underground
NYSE
Open Markets
Pajamas Media
Power Points
Ronald Coase Institute
SEC
Senate Banking Committee
Shuffletech
StockTwits
StockTwits TV
Take A Report
Tallgrass Beef
The Clubber Fund
The Grumpy Economist
The Jack B Show
The Minimalist Trader
The Polsky Center
The Streetwise Professor
TheStreet.com
Townhall
US Federal Reserve Bank
US House Financial Services Committee
US Treasury
Win Detergent
World War Two Blog
-


