Social Spending, Social Investing, Social Disruption

  • Posted by on October 6th, 2015 at 8:31 am

Yesterday I attended an Impact Investing conference in Chicago. Matt Bishop lead the discussion. It was interesting. I am very curious how others approach impact investing. In my portfolio, I have several companies that I would categorize as “impact” companies. They are, Tallgrass Beef, Dabble, Nextspace, Desktime, Deskpass, Brilliant, and Public Good,  That’s about half the active portfolio.  If you can become a customer of one of them or introduce someone to one of them, you will be making an impact.

I think that impact investing is finding its footing.  There are some points that Matt made that I will make here, but I also want to juxtapose them with some other points to try and add some context.

Here are three key points Matt made:

  1.  If it’s an equity investment, then traditional risk/reward variables hold.  The market is king.  The company must be built to survive and sustain in a market based environment.  Examples of this are linked above.  So would companies coming out of Impact Engine.
  2. If it’s a debt investment, then traditional risk/reward variables do not hold. It is acceptable to receive less than market rates on interest for loaning money.  Microloans are an example of this.  Loans to people so they can start a business at rates less than they could get from a bank would also be an example.  Of course, in this day and age they probably couldn’t go to a bank to get a loan.
  3. At the outset, a business has to have “impact intent”.  Meaning tackling a problem that is considered a societal ill.

Number 3 is where it gets messy.  Can I make a profit?  Over a range of people you might find enough things that are considered, “societal ills”, but if you sample enough people and ask the question different ways you probably won’t find a consensus.  It goes back to questions like, “What’s fair?”.  Normative economics are messy.

The Impact movement needs to be entrepreneur lead.  It cannot be lead by a government, or a foundation.  It can’t be lead by a funder.  They are feeders.  The principles that Brad Feld eloquently laid out in Startup Communities apply to the impact community too.  Follow them, they work.

I am a big fan of an entrepreneur creating a sustainable business that solves a problem government spending hasn’t solved.

But, when these problems are solved, government is often disintermediated.  Government loses power.  Government doesn’t like to lose power and uses it’s far reaching and obtrusive power to crush the entrepreneur in a lot of cases.  Currently we are seeing that with Uber and AirBnb.  We most certainly will see that with educational and medical startups.  Most of the impact companies I have seen to date are not a direct assault on government power-but that’s going to change as impact investing develops over time.  Government isn’t your buddy or pal. It’s often your competitor.

I believe impact investing disruption starts from the bottom up.  It cannot come from the top down because the bureaucracy will do everything in its power to hold power.  Bureaucracy will pick winners and losers.  Network beats hierarchy, and utilizing the network to innovate returns individual choice and power to people over bureaucracy.  Often we think of this in terms of corporate bureaucracy and innovative startups, but the same principle holds for government bureaucracy and innovative startups.

Conversely, often times to disrupt something the initial target market is the top of the market.  A company targets those with the best ability to pay.  Technology then starts to commoditize and filter down so that more and more people can afford it.   Cell phones are a good example.  Education might also be a good example.  The wealthy have less risk in choosing innovative companies since their safety net is much larger than a poor persons.  They can pay for things like ACT/SAT test prep.  They can opt out of public schools and send their kids to private school.  But, now there are online ways, like Benchprep, to reach more people with really good test prep.

Remember when Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg gave $100 million dollars to Newark, NJ schools.  None of the money went to the students.  It went to pay off pensions, and to pay consultants.  In other words, it fed the bureaucracy.  Zuckerberg would have been better off giving scholarships to poor kids, or setting up a VC fund that invested in impact companies.  Virtually all private money that goes into an effort to reform a public bureaucracy is wasted, no matter what bureaucracy.  Federal and state governments have spent billions on public education.  Individuals and foundations have poured billions into it too.  It’s almost a total fail.  Bill Gates will have lifted more people in the world up by creating Microsoft than he will with the Gates Foundation.

If we want to impact invest and solve what we perceive as problems, I have some suggestions on how to approach it.

  1.  Focus.  These issues are too big and broad for one startup.  Solve one tiny piece of the problem, and do it with one eye on top line revenue.  Revenue might not happen right away, but it has to be a part of executing the business sooner rather than later.
  2. Build a profit motive in the business to make it sustainable.  Otherwise, it’s just a charity.  Capitalism raises people up and creates more opportunities.  Making a profit means you are creating value.
  3. Invest with a guiding principle of putting power in the hands of the individual.  Don’t make their decisions for them.  Their property belongs to them.  Networks beat hierarchy and there are plenty of cool ways to use technology to build networks today.
  4. Don’t ask permission.  Scale fast.  Enable natural human behavior.  Uber is too big to regulate.  AirBnb is too big to regulate.

There are lots of opportunities to disrupt government bureaucracy.  Education, Farming, Transportation, Energy, Communication and Medicine are just a few of the places that can be 100% turned upside down.  The government bureaucrat is not some angel that divine intervention installed and will rule with the hand of King Solomon.  63% of our federal budget goes to entitlement spending and it is unsustainable.  That budget also feeds government bureaucracy and the jobs that come with it.  Entrepreneurs building impact companies will upend it and government spending should drop as a result.

The other really cool thing that building a startup does for the people that use it.  You give them hope.  You raise their standard of living.  Bureaucracies sap hope.  Do you enjoy navigating a corporate bureaucracy? Or government bureaucracy? It’s why President Reagan was so right when he said the worst words one could hear were, “We are from the government and we are here to help.”




The Latest

  • A Textbook Case on Organized Internet Lynching
    Posted by on October 5th, 2015 at 8:36 am

    One of the dangers of the the social internet is the potential to destroy someone. We have seen it with liberals attacking conservatives over issues. […]

  • A Thought On Gun Violence
    Posted by on October 4th, 2015 at 5:59 am

    The shooting in Oregon ought to turn your stomach no matter which side of the gun debate you are on. I have seen friends and […]

  • In Kentucky
    Posted by on October 3rd, 2015 at 7:49 am

    My wife had an event in Indianapolis, Indiana that she had to attend.  We drove to Indy, and decided not to head straight back to […]

  • A Tax That is A Trap, And Deceiving
    Posted by on October 2nd, 2015 at 5:10 am

    Yesterday, I read another article about enacting a transaction tax in Chicago to solve the city’s financial problems. There are alderman in the Chicago city […]

  • Statistics and Damn Statistics
    Posted by on October 1st, 2015 at 7:41 am

    Lots of people like to quote statistics.  Few understand them.  For example, every night on the WGN News, weatherman Tom Skilling likes to get a […]

  • Expressing the Why You Do What You Do
    Posted by on September 30th, 2015 at 7:42 am

    Have an early work out this morning at City Wide Super Slow. This week, two companies I am invested in were on Bootstrapping In America. […]

  • The Icahn Speaks
    Posted by on September 29th, 2015 at 8:20 am

    Billionaire investor Carl Icahn released a new video.  If you don’t understand much about the financial system, I’d be interested in hearing what you had […]

  • This Market Can’t Hold It’s Head Up
    Posted by on September 28th, 2015 at 7:42 am

    After looking at the blood moon last night, I checked US stock futures.  They were a little higher.  Nothing huge. China markets were all up. […]

  • A Fun Chicago Night
    Posted by on September 27th, 2015 at 11:31 am

    Last night, I had a pretty fun night. I’d like to tell you about it because it intersects so many things that I am passionate […]

  • China Isn’t Rising; They Are Already There
    Posted by on September 26th, 2015 at 9:08 am

    We keep our eyes on the Chinese market. It has performed horribly over the past several months. ASHR data by YCharts You have to wonder […]

  • Poker, Options and Startup Investing
    Posted by on September 25th, 2015 at 5:46 am

    Yesterday I had the pleasure of meeting Rafe Furst. He is running a crowdfunding site called Crowdfunder. I am a big fan of crowdfunding and […]

  • The VW Situation
    Posted by on September 24th, 2015 at 7:41 am

    If you read this blog regularly, you know I am a big fan of diesel.  I drive a BMW X5 diesel that I bought on […]

  • Your Health Care Right Keeps Getting More Expensive
    Posted by on September 23rd, 2015 at 10:24 am

    Advocates of Obamacare offered up several reasons for enacting the government program.  They argued that health care is a right determined by language in the […]

  • The Bubble is Somewhere Else
    Posted by on September 22nd, 2015 at 8:06 am

    There has been a lot of consternation over a bubble in startup valuations.  A lot of people are comparing the current state of tech valuations […]

  • Are You A Founder?
    Posted by on September 21st, 2015 at 7:33 am

    Please write a post as an investor on how you you look at skill of founders. I bet they are not particularly well rounded at […]

  • Do They Have Skill?
    Posted by on September 20th, 2015 at 9:57 am

    Please write a post as an investor on how you you look at skill of founders. I bet they are not particularly well rounded at […]

  • Carried Interest Taxes
    Posted by on September 19th, 2015 at 5:36 am

    Donald Trump said the US should start taxing the carried interest hedge fund, venture capitalists and private equity managers make. It might help people understand […]